Monday, April 8, 2013

Lonliness, love and another Etape 2013 training sportive

I'm writing this in pain - everything from my neck downwards hurts.

My thumb has been wrenched by a pot hole. My arms and hands are tired from absorbing  shaking and supporting my torso over the bars, it's worst in my triceps. My shoulders are aching, as is back. My legs, naturally, are tired with quads the worst off, while my left knee and right foot protest loudly at use.

On the plus side, my nose is fine.

Why? Well it was Sportive Sunday of course!

I rode 70 miles yesterday, with less than a kilometer of climbing, and my body hates me for it.

I've been trying (sort of) to boost my fitness, riding harder and more often, but I haven't really done a big volume of miles in one go. 40 or 50 miles was a common distance for a longer rides, with 30 to 40 for higher intensity, but that's not enough to get used to the sheer amount of time I'll need to spend in the saddle on the Etape.

Sunday was meant to help with that - a 60 mile sportive with twelvish miles getting to and from the start (with a train ride in the middle). Topping out at about 72ish overall. Not far from Etape distance.

I did my best to prepare. I ate a vast quantity of pasta the night before, had porridge and coffee the morning of, while sipping my carb-protein drink frequently and eating energy bars at regular intervals (every 20 miles or so).  Afterwards I stretched off and downed a recovery shake, ate a load of chicken and bread as soon as I could, had a biggish dinner and then another recovery shake before bed.

Basically everything I could think of bar compression socks (which I don't own). But I still hurt.

And the mental anguish is worst. Pez and Paul are now far better than me.

The ride

Longish and mostly flat

After frost, ice, wind and rain on our last two sportives, Sunday dawned bright, clear, dry and with temperatures the highest of the year (almost 10 degrees!).

Pez started hard, riding at 20mph or above on the flat. I was struggling early to hold his wheel. It got worse when some serious riders went by. They were, for a change, tall enough for him to draft, so he accelerated onto their wheels. The pace went up again.

I foolishly overtook the lot of them on a descent, as Pez was moving up to do his turn on the front of our group of five. The group disintegrated, and Pez easily overhauled me on the next climb.

That was how it went for 25 miles or so. If I could get on Pez or Paul's wheel I could handle their pace, at the next hill I was spat out the back, then it was a long lonely drag to get back on the rear tyre. Then we hit a hill and the process repeated. With me needing to ride longer, push harder, to catch their wheels.

After 25 miles of this, I gave up. Deciding to ride at my own pace as, in theory, it was about time in the saddle not speed; but, in fact, because it was too depressing slogging on my own to try and latch on to the group time after time after time.

And depressing is the word for it. Mile after mile after mile. Alone.

For a short period I worked with another rider, who took a tow from my wheel for a bit without me realising, then moved ahead and allowed me to latch onto his wheel. We repeated this for a few kilometres, despite never exchanging a word, look or gesture beyond the speed of our bikes.

My speed rose. Or, rather, I could hold 20mph comfortably for longer as I was getting a rest every minute or so. I began reeling in Paul. Then I lost the mystery man in the red jersey in traffic -  facing another slog to get onto a wheel I let him go too. He cycled off alone, glancing back periodically to see me further and further behind and no longer in a position to help.

My mind drifted as I rode on, generally with no other cyclists or cars visible ahead or behind me. It got weirder as the miles stacked up. Route markings were signs of love and reassurance left behind by a benevolent other. Through a pink arrow I felt briefly loved and remembered despite my isolation.

Other cyclists were sources of shame as they passed me or foes to be vanquished as I spied them ahead. I began to hate the very road, then love it just as fiercely when the surface changed from broken tarmac to become like marble beneath my tyres - my speed rose and fell as the surface changed.

I met up with Pez and Paul at break stops on 35 and 48 miles, but didn't stick with them as they rode on. It was about me, alone, covering the miles now. Spinning my pedals in the lowest gear up 4% hills, feeling a surge of energy and covering a false flat at 23 miles an hour, resting up at 15 for another mile.

My back began to hurt somewhere around mile 40. The discomfort there was worse than the pain in my legs - which I'd minimised by basically not exerting myself. I stopped to stretch.

I ended up needing to get off the bike twice to stretch my back, the second time someone asked if I was OK as they rode by. The human contact and words of concern almost broke me.

Then the ride ended in a rush - I'd almost reeled in another rider and was looking forward to a draft and then a time trial/sprint to the end when the flags of the finish line were suddenly right there.

After so long on my own on the road, it felt odd (although good to my back) to get off and walk. Talk to people. A bit of back and forth with Pez (resplendent in a pink Lampre top, making him look like he'd forgotten a jersey under his gilet) and Paul.

How did we do then?

From almost 200 riders on the day, Pez finished three places outside the top third, Paul seven places back.

Of course, Pez and Paul had waited for me at the break stops, longer than they might have if I hadn't dropped back, so their times were hurt by that. I came in 8 minutes after Paul and ten and a bit behind Pez.

That was enough, by the skin of my teeth, to get me into the top half.

Last time out I was 15 mins from the top half just outside the bottom third. It might not feel like it as Pez and Paul shot off ahead of me, but it seems I am - slowly - getting better, and when my body stops hurting I might even feel a little pride.

Now if I can just learn to climb...

Stats and such from Strava:

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

This is getting serious - April training for the 2013 Etape du Tour

This defeated me
I've not exactly been training as well as I might for the 2013 Etape du Tour.

Pez has been hitting the gym five times (at least) a week, Paul's bought a turbo trainer and heart-rate monitor and has been off on 3-hour "zone2" work outs. Bobby's been off on the hills on 90-mile rides.

Me? I've been riding to work a bit more often.

Over Easter I tried to get out more, notching a couple of 40-milers and a 20 mile recovery ride. But on Sunday I was defeated, twice, by hills in the South Downs.

That has to end now. So, I've found a training programme for April from the people organising our Etape trip.
Here it is:

Weekends


Two types of weekend to build a tolerance to the mileage (A) and a tolerance to intensity (B).

‘Weekend A’ is one long ride (preferably on the Saturday), followed by an easy hour or rest day the following day. Crank it up a notch on what is your normal or comfortable pace. ie increase the intensity you ride hills, try and go 1 tooth further down the cogs, work hard on intensifying pace to maintain cadence, try and add some 20 min harder sets into the ride. ie 2×20 min sets going up the biggest hills of the ride of increased exercise effort.

‘Weekend B’: Two × 2-3 hour rides over the weekend with an increase in intensity. ie Saturday is three hours at a pace noticeably more difficult than your stock long ride pace. Not a long interval, it can include 2 × 20 min intervals if you like, but really just upping the intensity a perceivable notch. Go out again on Sunday and doing another two hour ride at that same intensity. Increasing the cadence on this weekend just to give those legs a little more ‘zap’!

If you are doing a Sportive, add that as your ‘Weekend A’.

Mid-Week

90 minute to 2 hours (Tuesday), done at an easy pace because you will still be recovering from the weekend.

1 hour (Thursday) on the turbo. Try some 5-3-1’s. These are a 10 min warm up, 5 minutes hard, 3 minutes really hard and 1 minute flat out. 10 minutes easy recovery and repeat that 2-3 times.  If on the road, do 2 sets of 7 minutes, 5 minutes, 3 minutes at the same intensity zones.

Life gets in the way

We've got two sportives planned for April, so that's Weekend A sorted, and spinning round Regents Park a few times on my ride home should let me get the mid-week rides in.

The 'Weekend B' is more of a challenge, as it falls on days where I have weddings and a cricket tour I've said I'm going to. But I'll try and get as much as possible in. Or even a bit more than that if I can find a way.

Wish me luck!

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Correct 2013 Etape du Tour broom wagon times

Good news! The 2013 Etape du Tour is shorter than we thought!

Bad news! It seems to have only lost 2km of flat from the start.

Going through the timing sheet with fellow Etapper Pez (he made a spreadsheet) there was a problem.

The distances to the summits on the cut off time sheet and the official route were out. He tracked this to the start.

Which means my technical route analysis for broom wagon times needs to adjust thusly:
(Print out and keep/tape to top-tube guide follows...)

Format is: Distance, nature of road, speed needed, broom wagon/cut off time at the end of that stretch.
  •     Start: 08:30
  •     10km - flat - 30kph - 08:50
  •     5.4km at 5.8% Côte de Puget - 9.8kph - 09:23
  •     1.5km downhill + 3.6km at 6.2% Col de Leschaux - 10.2kph - 09:54
  •     9.5km rolling downhill overall - 9.2kph - 10:52
  •     6km at 4% Côte de Aillons-le-Vieux - 13kph - 11:19
  •     4.5km slightly downhill - 13kph - 11:40
  •     3.5km at 6.5% Col des Prés - 10.5kph-  12:00
  •     11.5km descent (technical) - 17.7kph - 12:39
  •     16km at 5.4% Col du Mont-Revard - 9.5kph - 14:20
  •     12km descent (fast) - 28.8kph - 14:45
  •     23.5km basically flat (slightly downhill) - 14.5kph - 16:22
  •     11.5km at 8.3% Montée finale du Semnoz - 6.8kph - 18:04
  •     Collapse exhausted (hopefully ahead of Broom Wagon)
On the plus side, this all looks far more logical now.

Monday, March 25, 2013

2013 Etape du Tour cut off times and technical route analysis


Every exam I've ever taken I've revised the same way. What topics come up most often? How many different ones are covered? What is each section worth to the overall mark?

Knowing everything about the reformation of the monasteries, for example, is no good if it's only coming up in 50% of papers and even then worth just 20% of the marks.  You need to know about the break with Rome too. And Wolsey's efforts to get Henry VIII a divorce. Otherwise no matter how good you are at Cranmer and Cromwell, you could still fail.

It's not about revising less, it's about making your revision count. To revise right you need to know the pass mark and what each section is worth.

But until now I've not known the pass mark is for the 2013 Etape.

How long do I have to get up Mont Revard? How long to reach the bottom of Annecy-Semnoz? How fast on the flats?

I do now. The 2013 Etape du tour cut-off times have just been released.

Of course, a lot depends on what pen you're put in at the start, but I've now got something to work with. An idea of how much time I have to finish [ideally] ahead of the broom wagon.

So this is how it looks* (minimum speeds to beat the broom wagon attached)

Format is: Distance, nature of road, speed needed, cut off time at the end of that stretch.
  • Start: 08:30
  • 12km - flat - 30kph - 09:00
  • 5.4km at 5.8% Côte de Puget - 14kph - 09:23
  • 1.5km downhill - 2kph- 09:45
  • 3.6km at 6.2% Col de Leschaux - 24kph** - 09:54
  • 9.5km rolling downhill overall - 10.3kph - 10:59
  • 6km at 4% Côte de Aillons-le-Vieux - 12kph - 11:29
  • 4.5km slightly downhill - ???
  • 3.5km at 6.5% Col des Prés - 16kph (including descent)-  12:00
  • 11.5km descent (technical) - 18kph - 12:39
  • 16km at 5.4% Col du Mont-Revard - 7kph - 14:20
  • 12km descent (fast) - 26kph - 14:48
  • 23.5km basically flat (slightly downhill) - 11.5kph - 16:51
  • 11km at 8.3% Montée finale du Semnoz - 9kph - 18:04
  • Collapse exhausted (hopefully ahead of Broom Wagon)
*the route doesn't seem to quite match the cut-off time sheet, so there's a bit of fudging. It's close to right.

**including the previous descent makes that stretch 5.1km at 10.2kph at an average gradient I haven't worked out


I'll go through it in more detail, factoring drinks and food stops and attach a spreadsheet later on.

But initial thoughts are the start is quickish and you might need to be even quicker as the  climb to the top of Côte de Puget is also fairly rapid.

In fact, the first 22.5km (to the top of Col de Leschaux) is hard. Overall a 17kph average with 9km of climbing at an average of 6% in there.

After that, you should hopefully be banking time to get to the bottom of Annecy-Semnoz well ahead of 5pm.

Now, to train.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

There are no mountains in England - warm weather training for the Etape du Tour

None of these in England (Photo Andy @aj6474 Just-Pedal chef)
Three thousand five hundred and one metres. That's how much climbing there is on the 2013 Etape du Tour.

There are at least two categorised climbs on stage 20 of this year's Tour de France. The stage I've signed up to ride in July.

But there are no real mountains in England and nothing as high as Mont Revard or Annecy Semnoz anywhere in the UK. No way to experience miles and miles of ascent without end. Or to practice a half hour descent.

But France has them, Italy has them, Spain has them and several islands within an easyJet flight of London have them. Also, February in England is cold.

So Pez, Paul and I went to Mallorca.

A week's riding in the favoured winter training resort of Team Sky was on offer by the Just-Pedal team. With great accommodation, meals by an in house chef, support vehicle, in-ride nutrition and guided rides. Fourteen of us were part of the group, along with five ride leaders.

On Sunday I met my first mountain. It didn't go well.



Coll de sa Batalla is 8.3 kilometres long rising 433 metres from the foot of the climb at 5.1% (Strava tells me). It took me 41 minutes and seven seconds. Six minutes more than Pez, who'd never beaten me on a climb before. I was dead last of a group that included several reluctant partners of keener riders (one of whom beat me by more than 12 minutes).

On a climb gentler than Box Hill, I'd averaged more than three kph under my best time there. It. Just. Didn't. Stop.

As an introduction to mountain riding it's fair to say it wasn't the best.

Excuses in early
I'd not ridden for some time, thanks to a bug picked up a week or two before the trip, so I popped off to play football on the Monday before we flew out to try and get some last minute cardio in.

With 20 minutes of the game left I fell - badly. A crunch, roll and muted scream later I sat on the astro-turf desperately checking to see if my ankle was broken or 'just' badly sprained. Thankfully, it didn't seem broken.

The next six days were a frantic race to get it in some condition to ride on - ice packs, compression bandages, ankle supports and elevation whenever possible meant that by Wednesday I could just about walk and by Friday my limp was greatly reduced. My ankle looked awful, but I flew out regardless - scared but hopeful.

Of course, that's no excuse for my performance up the hill on day one.

What goes up...

Once the coll had been, if not vanquished, at least mildly chided, we had to come down again. A real descent.

I've always thought I could descend, but it's never been more than a thought. I can. If not well, then better than anyone else in my group that day.

Spending 25 minutes going down, instead of 2, was another new experience - one I loved as much as I'd hated going up.

Tucking in, letting the bike run, swooping towards a corner, braking softly then harder and harder until I could see the exit, getting instantly on the power. Using as much of the road as I could.

Superb.

Wheeeeeee!!!!!
Lessons from the colls

I'd clock 360 kilometres and 4,589 metres of climbing over six rides that week. I learnt a lot, which I'll talk about later to stop this becoming an epic novel rather than a blog post.

The first lesson was fuelling. I hit the bottom of sa Batalla on the back of 60 kilometres of riding having eaten far too little. I didn't make that mistake again.

How long a climb lasts was also something I'd never considered before. There's nothing long enough near me for that to matter.

But knowing exactly how much is left is incredibly important, it means you can pace yourself, set a tempo and really feel you're making progress - one k done, half way there, just two to go, entering the final stretch... Each mental marker makes the mountain less frightening. The progress more palpable.

The next key was pacing. My newly acquired heart rate monitor wasn't plugged in that first climb, it was when I tackled it on Thursday (sadly by a different route so no direct comparison is possible).

Holding a heart rate of between 160 and 170 bpm meant I knew I could handle the pace. If I dropped too low I pushed harder, if I went to hard I eased off. But I knew from turbo sessions at that rate I could definitely keep going for at least an hour.

That certainty, coupled with an absolute knowledge of how far was left, gave me confidence to ride harder.

Completing the Etape is still a long way off, but I understand the route to the finish far better now. And there will be some fabulous descents to look forward to along the way.

Monday, February 11, 2013

Second Sportive - The Wrong Decision

Hello, I’m Pez - a member of Team Etape. This Sunday myself, Paul and James were meant to be “cruising” the 50 mile route of our second sportive. It didn’t quite work out that way.

James ducked out, claiming he was still recovering from a bug, so I and fellow Etaper Paul planned to head off to the Gatwick Ride It Sportive on our own.

This was considered to be a good test of fitness as the 52 mile route only had around 2200ft of climbing so we hoped to finish comfortably in a good time.

The weather had other ideas. For the week leading up to the event the forecast for the Gatwick area was constant light rain from 7am until long into the afternoon. It resolutely refused to change and on the day before we were due to ride a game of chicken ensued where neither I nor Paul wanted to be the first to call it off.

Sunday morning came and the weather where I live (about 40 miles from Gatwick) was ok, scattered showers and 4 degrees, so after a further round of phone chicken I headed off to meet Paul. This was the wrong decision.

As we drove towards the start the weather gradually got worse and talk moved from whether we should do the shorter 33 mile route to whether we should just turn around and go home. The decision was taken that as we had driven so far we would just do the short route and try to get it out of the way as quickly as possible.

The ride started well. It was a lovely route with relatively clear roads – even with the standing water and the deteriorating conditions we managed to get to the top of the first real climb, about 15 miles in, in around an hour. As we hid under a bus shelter with a couple of other people the weather gradually got worse. We sucked it up and continued on to the rest stop after 21 miles.

The descent following this climb made me realise how much colder you can get when everything is wet. My face was frozen and a lack of proper waterproof gloves meant that it was becoming increasingly difficult to manage the brakes properly. I could also no longer feel my toes, having destroyed my shoe covers mountain biking a few months ago and not got round to buying new ones.

We stopped at the next rest stop, fuelled up on flapjacks and carried on for six more miles. After a final regroup we headed off and despite some hairy downhills I managed to cover the final 7 miles relatively quickly and hurried into the event centre to try and warm up and wait for Paul.

I waited and I waited. 10 minutes in I got concerned and tried phoning him - he is usually a stronger rider than me and the idea I could take that much time out of him in 7 miles made no sense. After 20 minutes he turned up and explained that he was so late because he had to stop for 15 minutes to try and warm his hands up enough to physically squeeze his brakes.

With hands so cold we could barely work the quick release on our front wheels we loaded up the car and then sat in the parking lot for 20 minutes with our hands in front of the heater until Paul felt it was safe for him to drive.

Then we got lost.

After a drive which was an hour longer than it should be Paul finally dropped me off and I grimly rode the last 5 miles home. Putting my hands back in my wet gloves was one of the least pleasant experiences of my life but it was better than having no gloves at all. Upper Tooting Road is among my least favourite places to cycle in good conditions so doing it whilst shivering and wet was a particularly horrible way to end the day.

On reflection we should have trusted the weather forecast and realised that without serious wet weather kit this ride would not have been pleasant. The only positive for me was that after the 33 miles I felt absolutely fine, in terms of legs and lungs, and would happily have done the next 20 to finish the medium Sportive if the weather had been better.

Paul on the other hand described it as ‘the worst day of his life’ which I felt may have been pushing it a little bit but then again he did have a harder time on the ride than me and I didn’t have to drive afterwards.

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Eating is cheating - how to not to fuel when Etape training

Fellow Etaper Bobby fancied a ride this weekend. It was cold (maxing out at 5 degrees), clear, dry with intermittent sunshine.

So Pez and I joined him for a much-delayed trip to Box Hill with my new bike.

The bikes seemed unaffected by the climb, unlike their riders


Bobby scares me a bit. The only time I've ridden with him was a jaunt around the Englischer Garten in Munich, on hired city bikes (the incredibly heavy things that brake when you pedal backwards – something like these). No real indication of ability at all.

He's a bit taller than me, a fair bit lighter than me, runs regularly and on a secret training camp in Tenerife (ie he was the only member of Team Underprepared involved) rode from sea level to the rim of the volcano one day - a 2,000m ascent.

That was in December, when I was puffing round a 50-mile UK sportive.

We decided to cruise* until we reached Box Hill, arriving at the foot of the zig-zags 24 miles into the ride (for me, everyone came from different places to meet up).

And up we went.

The climb, always one of the jewels of the South Downs, has become something of a destination over the last couple of years. First the World Championships, then the Olympic men and women’s road race went up it (multiple times).

It was the fifth most popular bit of tarmac to ride on in the world last year. The road still has paint on it urging Cav, Wiggo and Froome Dog to ride like the wind.

Here's the Strava segment for the climb:


Bobby massacred me. On a bike that cost £300 new. With no clip-in shoes. Carrying a back pack weighing a fair few kilos.

Pez crested the hill a few seconds behind me.

At this point I'd had 200 calories of food all day (porridge for breakfast). That was it. Pez and Bobby wandered to the cafe while I minded the bikes at our table.

They came back with cake and espresso (Pez keeping it traditional) and a pasty. I had an energy bar.

Traditional cycling cafe food
Less tradiditonal cycling fare


We chatted, ate, and then Bobby looks up and says "let's do Box Hill again". No. Just no.

He then pointed out we were training for the Etape and needed hill work. He was, of course, right. Bastard.

Pez and Bobby at the Box Hill cafe, he's about to tell us to ride up the hill again

Box hill is 2.5km at 5%, topping out at 11.8% for sections. Mont Revard is 16km at 5.5%, so more than 6 Box Hills. Without a break at a cafe. With mountains behind and ahead.

So down we went and up we rode. I went from 15kph average to 14kph on the second climb. It hurt. Bobby wanted to do it again. We resisted successfully this time.

The view from the top is, to be fair, stunning. But taking off from the viewing point to begin the 25-odd miles home my legs weren't happy. Weren't happy at all.

Box Hill view

And to my right... Another Box Hill view
On the route home I covered a lot of familiar roads, it was embarrassing. Climbs I normally barely notice saw me shift into the small ring. Flats I tap along at 20mph I was averaging 15 on. There wasn't anything in the tank.

I kept in touch with Pez and Bobby by basically nailing my chin to the handlebars on any descent and making up some of the lost time.

47 miles in we stopped at another cafe, at that point, I worked out, I'd had 400 calories of food all day. I'd burnt 1,200 on the ride at that point (according to Strava). I had cake. And a Coke.

I managed the remaining 7 miles home somehow, even accelerating a bit at the end, but I really, really need to learn how to eat properly during a ride.

On the plus side, for all the damage Bobby did to me on the climbs, he got cramp on the ride home. Fast, he certainly is, but fragile.

*this never actually happens

Sunday, January 27, 2013

When training for the Etape du Tour, heart beats legs

I accidentally bought a heart rate monitor. Now, I understand that's a hard thing to do. Spilling a drink by accident? Easy. Tripping on the power cord from the Hoover by accident? Easy. Buying a heart rate monitor? Hard.

I blame Gerry. After a post on turbo training, he said a heart rate monitor was needed for some indoor training. So I took a look speculatively then put one on my Amazon wish list. Or rather, in my basket so I could think about it.

Then some months later, when buying something else, I hit "one click purchase". This then shipped both items to my default address.

So, I now have a heart rate monitor. Naturally, I had to use it.

It's all about heart

Heart rate is key successful riding, we are told. When your legs go, deep into a ride, it's not really your legs that are the problem. It's the entire aerobic system. Basically, you're not getting enough oxygen to your muscles.

To do better you need to increase your aerobic fitness, and that's about endurance training.

So, after finding out my resting (72bpm, utterly average) and my probable maximum (190, solid for my age, but provisional until I do a proper test) heart rates I could work out a good rate to hold for effective endurance training.

These training zones are recommended by Cycling Australia:
  • VO2 Max Boosting: 92%-100%, so 174-190bpm for me (Sprint training - or 20 min time trial training)
  • Anabolic Threshold endurance: 85%-91%, 161-173 (Really good for fitness improvement, great for hills)
  • General aerobic endurance: 75%-84%, 142.5-160 (increase muscle glycogen storage, doesn't improve fitness though)
  • Basic aerobic endurance: 65%-74%, 123.5-142 (for building up 'base' cycling fitness, warming up and cooling down)
  • Recovery: 50%-64%, 95-123 (recovery rides, for 'flushing out muscles' between more intense training)
  • Rest: Less than 50%, under 95 (active recovery, ie walking after a ride or stretching)
Of course, being me, I didn't know any that before I started my turbo ride.

Instead, all geed up by my new heart rate monitor, I guessed 140-160bpm would be about right and so trained to that.

I spent almost the entire training period in a heart rate zone that was "riding too fast to build your aerobic base but too slow to develop your V02MAX and lactate threshold.

"Cyclists that train in this zone a lot end up quickly reaching a plateau in their fitness." [source]

I did "burst" three times, to the VO2 Max boosting level, but that was because I was bored.

On the plus side, I now know better. Next time I get on the turbo, it's all about 161-173. There are mountains in France to conquer.

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Ouch

This entry was meant to be about Box Hill. The first weekend ride of 2013 was going to take me and Pez to the Surrey Hills on a 47-mile spin out to the iconic climb (and 5th most popular cycling location on the planet in 2012) and then back again. It didn't work out that way.

Pez, still injured from our New Year's Eve house party (he fell off a couch), was struggling. Seven miles in we decided to make a 20-miler instead.

So far, so mildly disappointing. Then, about a mile from home, I pulled up to a red light and instantly lost my rear wheel while braking.

I sprawled sideways off the bike into the middle of the road, mercifully short of the junction, with a stationary bus looking on behind me.

My knee hurt, my right hand hurt and I was pretty sure I'd massively blown my rear tyre.

I got up (the lights were still red, so more small mercies), got off the road and did a quick bike safety check. Tyres: incredibly, surprisingly unpunctured. Front wheel: Spinning nicely. Front brakes: working. Back wheel and brakes: Ditto. Spin the pedals, back wheel spun fine. Also, the gear changed. I didn't think anything of it.

I got back on, a little shaky, and rode the last mile home. In the process of this I discovered none of my rear gears worked. At all.

So what happened? Well, there was a flattened drinks can near the bike I kicked out of the way (thinking it might have been responsible for the puncture) when I pulled myself off the tarmac - my best guess is that this was under the rear wheel when I hit the brakes and worked as a skate, sliding along and taking away any traction.

The gears? The cable-fixing bolt is gone. As far as I can tell that's the only problem with them, but until I get a new one (£2.99 as far as I can work out) I'm down to two gears.

The lessons? Check gears as well as brakes, pedals and tyres after an off. That way you can see the bolt/missing bits on the road. Pay more attention to what's on the road surface when braking. On a more positive note, nothing fell out of my back pockets, not that I checked that until I got home either.

Sad PS
I've posted an ad and someone's coming to look at the Bianchi tomorrow morning. I'm sad to lose her, but I just can't justify keeping her either.

Happier PS
New jacket is great - warm with just a base layer underneath. New Merino base layer ace too.

Super-happy PS
I asked in my local Evans, to see if they could order in a bolt for me, and the man in the workshop came out and handed me one. "How much do I owe you?" "It's a present," he replied.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

First sportive


"By the end of January, a good target is to complete a 45 mile ride," so reads Ron's Etape Website regarding training for last year's Etape du Tour.

I'd set myself harsher targets. Worried that I wouldn't put enough training in later on, I wanted to start harder.

To do this I set out a list of Sportives that I planned to ride to keep me motivated and asses my progress.

Gerry - a personal Etape hero - seems to approve. "I found sportives to be the best practice, since it's full on and 'twitchy'," he wrote responding to my experiences of club riding.

And so to Sunday, my first Sportive - and the last of the 2012 season -  the Dorking RideIt.

This was available in Fun (13 miles), short (30 miles), medium (50 miles) and long (70 miles) varieties. I planned for the medium - more than equalling my end of January target two months ahead of schedule.

The panic set in early.

First - the weather. It was cold. Really cold.  “Below 0°, you shouldn’t go, even if you dress correctly," advises Jean-Claude Bagot, former professional cyclist as part of the official Etape organisers winter training guide. It was -1

The weather in Dorking - we left at 07:30am
But I'd already signed on the line, paid my money, and despite frequent checks for the latest updates to see if it would be cancelled, it wasn't.

Clothes and equipment for the sportive,
I forgot a recovery shake
I decided to get as much clothing on as possible. Socks, second socks, shoe covers (a new addition - the idea is to keep your feet warm and dry in the cold and wet), bib tights, base layer, jersey, arm warmers, gillet, thick outer layer, windproof gloves, windproof headband. Basically, most of my cycling gear at once.

I was still cold.

The 2.5 mile ride to Clapham Junction with fellow Etaper Pez to meet a third member of Team Underprepared Paul saw my hands almost seize up. I was riding and blowing on them whenever possible. This was stupid, as it frequently only resulted in my sun glasses fogging up.

Which brings me to another climate issue. The sky was as clear as only a midwinter sky can be - the sun was as low as that implies.

The choice was between being blind or [even] colder. The frost was still on the ground.

The weather as we prepared for the start
I was also worried about my gears. I'd fixed my rattling cassette - by putting the spacer I'd forgotten last time back in. But that messed quite badly with the alignment of the derailleur.

I had an hour long fight with it, eventually fixed the alignment, and in the process lost at least half my gears. The climbing ones. I had another fight with the gears. Lost. Went off and watched rugby. Came back and - in a flash of inspiration - worked out what I needed to do.

They seemed [mostly] fixed, but I was a bit worried as I stood in a starting pen in the cold, waiting to be given the all-clear to ride past the timing point and listening to a man tell me to follow arrows and be careful of ice.

Slightly colder than before, we set off. Early on there were problems for Pez. Despite my tender ministrations - informed by my struggles with my own gears and sort of fixing them after I broke them - his gears were still slipping. His chain also came off on one of the early climbs.

Not a good sign on a route heavy with hills.

There was magic too. About 10 miles in, at the head of our band of three, I found myself in a magical cyclist moment. A clear day, my hands warmed up, my legs fresh, on a country lane and miles of rolling farmland to see either side of me. I wasn't pushing my pedals, they just moved with me. At one with the bike and out in the air.

'Newdigate'
More, there was the usual joy of England's countryside - inappropriately named villages. I missed snapping the main sign to this village, but saw another and almost lost the bike hitting ice/slush while braking and turning so I could get a picture of another one. Totally worth it.

But trouble was coming. It was soon clear there was more wrong with Pez than just his bike. He was breathing hard and pace-setting he was clearly 4-5 miles an hour slower than normal. At the first food break (22 miles in), he tried to cough his lungs out to get in enough air. That was more or less it. He decided to peel off and head down the 30-mile route.

Paul and I continued on the 50-miler.

Now, a quick look at the route profile will show you that at this point we hadn't been tested. The Dorking RideIt sees you climb over a kilometre, more than I'd ever done on a single ride, and most of it was at the end.

I found a few things out over the next 20 miles. First, Paul can climb better than me. A fair bit better. But not enough that I can't catch him [and pass him] on the descents.

I also learnt I can descend better than I thought. Looking ahead, braking progressively, and letting the bike run - giving me confidence even over a rather treacherous, icy surface. Of course, this might just be early stages of Rule 64.

Free food at the drink stop
The day proved the value of my giant gear thoroughly. Despite fuelling more than adequately (ie stuffing my face with free flapjacks and energy bars at the drink stop), I still didn't have the legs.

I made it up the first big climb, I got most of the way up the second, but then stopped.  And walked.

I met Paul at the top.

The third climb hurt more. I wasn't going to walk again, I definitely wasn't going to walk again. Even if the gradient hit 25% again (the second climb was hard - although to be fair it was only in the 20%s for a short while - stretch leading up to that was a mere 14%), I wasn't going to walk again. Paul got off and walked ahead of me. I rode up to him and dismounted.

I made it up the 4th main climb mainly thanks to my big gear - it let me sit and spin at no speed up 5%-7% climbs, taking almost nothing out of my spent legs.

I didn't walk again. There were some nasty little inclines to come but I knew they couldn't last. I gutted it out, counting pedal stroke by painful pedal stroke, until they were crested. Most of the time I even remembered to shift into my big chainring at the top.

Dorking RideIt profile
My back started to hurt by about mile 35. It might be that my set-up needs tweaking, but as Paul and I both experienced it, I'm thinking it's more the amount of time (4-hours-odd, all told) in the saddle with almost no break that was the cause. That should improve as I become more used to it.

By the time we finished (the downhill finish saw me 'beat' Paul by a meter or three), my legs were gone. But I'd done it. Almost without walking and at an average speed of 13.4mph.

A rubbish time, a rubbish speed, but one fast enough to keep me ahead of almost any Etape broom wagon of recent years.

I might never be a climber, but I'd gone up more than I ever have in a day. Now all I need to do is learn to be able to climb three-and-a-half times as much, without walking, by July - when at least the weather should be warmer...

Addendum
The scores are on the doors and the photos on the web.

I finished officially one second ahead of Paul in 163rd place (he's in 164). It wasn't a race* - as we were repeatedly told, and requiring me to spend far too much time manually working out my place - but that puts me towards the back, 15 minutes from the top half (I was just about outside the bottom third, but the time was in the middle - a minute either way would have moved c10 places up or down). Pez came in 26th of the 75 people who completed the shout course.

You can see me, Paul and Pez on the official photographer's site via the links below:

Me - knackered, but about to shift into the big ring by the looks of it
Paul - not knackered - confused by something I'm doing (perhaps shifing to the big ring while knackered)
Me again almost looking like a cyclist
Pez - one of only two confirmed people who attempted the sub-zero ride in shorts

Pez - shorn of his fellow Etapers, rides the last miles alone (great shot of the ride conditions/beauty)
Pez - so lonely


*and we didn't treat it as one - poven by our faffing at the drink stop, repeatedly waiting for each other to catch up and easy pace on the flat early on, but then as it wasn't a race this probably equalises out with other people doing this sort of thing too so the overall score is as fair a measure as I can come to